TLPS - Revision history

WikiSysop at 06:01, 24 August 2015

2015-08-24T06:01:38Z

WikiSysop at 01:07, 21 August 2015

2015-08-21T01:07:57Z

WikiSysop at 13:09, 19 March 2015

2015-03-19T13:09:33Z

WikiSysop at 18:06, 10 March 2015

2015-03-10T18:06:50Z

WikiSysop at 12:16, 6 March 2015

2015-03-06T12:16:52Z

WikiSysop at 11:13, 6 March 2015

2015-03-06T11:13:44Z

WikiSysop at 16:04, 4 March 2015

2015-03-04T16:04:30Z

WikiSysop at 11:47, 1 March 2015

2015-03-01T11:47:23Z

WikiSysop at 20:30, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T20:30:53Z

WikiSysop at 11:09, 28 February 2015

2015-02-28T11:09:32Z

@@ Line 173: / Line 173: @@
 CCB: Yes, it could, if one looks at it from the point of view of time. However, Karl Marx, in “The Meteors,” the fifth chapter of his doctoral dissertation, uses the theory of celestial bodies of Epicurus to argue almost the opposite. To him, understanding the materiality of meteorites allows one to avoid any belief in the unknowable and the infinite: “The heavenly bodies are the supreme realization of weight. In them all antinomies between form and matter, between concept and existence, which constituted the development of the atom, are resolved; in them, all required determinations are realized”. One way or another, the Campo del Cielo meteorite field 1,200 kilometers north of Buenos Aires in Argentina was known from time immemorial to the pre-Columbian inhabitants of the region and since the late sixteenth century to the Spanish, although only in the late 1700s were scientists convinced that meteorites fell from the sky and were not rocks coming from the earth’s core.
 DB: One last question. With this exhibition we are trying to rejoin what belongs together. But, of course, our rock is still in two parts. Do you see this as a tragic work?
@@ Line 178: / Line 179: @@
 http://www.portikus.de/exhibition_16600.html?&L=1
 [[Category:Art]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 21 August 2015
Line 178:		Line 178:

	http://www.portikus.de/exhibition_16600.html?&L=1		http://www.portikus.de/exhibition_16600.html?&L=1
		+
		+	[[Category:Art]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:09, 19 March 2015
Line 154:		Line 154:

	* http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/post-internet-poetry-comes-of-age		* http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/post-internet-poetry-comes-of-age
		+
		+
		+
		+	Foreword from the book The Campo del Cielo Meteorites – Vol. 1: El Taco
		+
		+	Carolyn Christov-Bakargiev: What is in the world that is older than the world?
		+
		+	Daniel Birnbaum: So you mean this object is somehow not part of our world?
		+
		+	CCB: Yes—it has become part of our world, but it comes from far away and is very, very old. It is transcendent and immanent at once. And it is in such an impossible condition because it has gone through a sort of trauma when it got pulled into our orbit and was shattered.
		+
		+	DB: I presume that this will be the oldest object in the exhibition. Are you sure it is an artwork?
		+
		+	CCB: Are we sure of anything? Are we sure that we are “we” because we know we shall die, and because we have language? What is an artwork according to you?
		+
		+	DB: Well, I doubt that I can give you a satisfactory definition of the notion of “art” right away. But I am quite convinced that this cosmic readymade will be accepted as a work of art—and a pretty great one at that. There is a rather recent book titled After Finitude by the French philosopher Quentin Meillassoux that would be worth mentioning here. He talks about objects that are so ancient that they precede not only humanity and intelligent life on the planet, but also any form of life known to us. He asks what these objects might have to say about our modern philosophical tradition, which takes subjectivity and language as its starting point. For him, the fact that we have these objects and can make scientific statements about them forces us beyond an insistence on finitude that is typical of modern thinking after Kant. The meteorite could be an example…
		+
		+	CCB: Yes, it could, if one looks at it from the point of view of time. However, Karl Marx, in “The Meteors,” the fifth chapter of his doctoral dissertation, uses the theory of celestial bodies of Epicurus to argue almost the opposite. To him, understanding the materiality of meteorites allows one to avoid any belief in the unknowable and the infinite: “The heavenly bodies are the supreme realization of weight. In them all antinomies between form and matter, between concept and existence, which constituted the development of the atom, are resolved; in them, all required determinations are realized”. One way or another, the Campo del Cielo meteorite field 1,200 kilometers north of Buenos Aires in Argentina was known from time immemorial to the pre-Columbian inhabitants of the region and since the late sixteenth century to the Spanish, although only in the late 1700s were scientists convinced that meteorites fell from the sky and were not rocks coming from the earth’s core.
		+
		+	DB: One last question. With this exhibition we are trying to rejoin what belongs together. But, of course, our rock is still in two parts. Do you see this as a tragic work?
		+
		+	CCB: I see the reunification of El Taco meteorite, from Campo del Cielo, as a joyous work that celebrates—at least provisionally—the possibility of reintegration. The fact that it gets divided again, at the end of the exhibition, just means that art could be a lot better than life.
		+
		+	http://www.portikus.de/exhibition_16600.html?&L=1

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 10 March 2015
Line 151:		Line 151:

	You can also increasing the infil to 25%. Instead of creating a square infil pattern, Cura will make parallel lines much tighter every other layer creating a better bed (or possibly airflow between gaps?) that dramatically reduce/eliminate pillowing.		You can also increasing the infil to 25%. Instead of creating a square infil pattern, Cura will make parallel lines much tighter every other layer creating a better bed (or possibly airflow between gaps?) that dramatically reduce/eliminate pillowing.
		+
		+
		+	* http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/post-internet-poetry-comes-of-age

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 6 March 2015
Line 146:		Line 146:

	* there are so many uncontrollable factors and unexpected outputs that ive almost begun to believe in printer fengshui. like right now i think my table has good fengshui for 3d printers because the prints looked nicer when i printed with the machine on this table.		* there are so many uncontrollable factors and unexpected outputs that ive almost begun to believe in printer fengshui. like right now i think my table has good fengshui for 3d printers because the prints looked nicer when i printed with the machine on this table.
		+
		+
		+	Between 24% and 25% Cura changes it's algorithm for infill. At 24% it prints basically the same pattern on every layer. At 25% it prints the same pattern but odd layers all the lines are parallel and on the next (even) layer all the lines run in the other direction perpendicular to the odd layer. This pattern looks much more dense looking down on the print but has more gaps (or at least isn't as strong bonding between layers) when looking horizontally.
		+
		+	You can also increasing the infil to 25%. Instead of creating a square infil pattern, Cura will make parallel lines much tighter every other layer creating a better bed (or possibly airflow between gaps?) that dramatically reduce/eliminate pillowing.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:13, 6 March 2015
Line 143:		Line 143:
	* charlotte: sucks out the romance of wanting to know what it is		* charlotte: sucks out the romance of wanting to know what it is
	* designed intention glitch		* designed intention glitch
		+
		+
		+	* there are so many uncontrollable factors and unexpected outputs that ive almost begun to believe in printer fengshui. like right now i think my table has good fengshui for 3d printers because the prints looked nicer when i printed with the machine on this table.

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 4 March 2015
Line 136:		Line 136:
	WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf		WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf
	when my body make contact with the 3d printer i hear a sound in m headphones		when my body make contact with the 3d printer i hear a sound in m headphones
		+
		+
		+	* moving it to less about the filling it as blank holes and more about the vagaries and critique of the internet's understanding of what an object is
		+	what about the magic we give to objects
		+	* james said why so uninteresting? what's behind it?
		+	* charlotte: sucks out the romance of wanting to know what it is
		+	* designed intention glitch

@@ Line 130: / Line 130: @@
 Magical thinking where printing is concerned.
 Scale
 Printer fengshui?
 Meditating drones
 WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf
 when my body make contact with the 3d printer i hear a sound in m headphones

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 28 February 2015
Line 133:		Line 133:
	Meditating drones		Meditating drones
	WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf		WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf
		+	when my body make contact with the 3d printer i hear a sound in m headphones

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 28 February 2015
Line 113:		Line 113:
	* negative capability		* negative capability
	* L'Argent, bresson		* L'Argent, bresson
		+
		+
		+	* welcome to the museum of curiosity
		+	because of the unique way that the bbc allocates its funding
		+	we’ve been allocated this huge magnificent building
		+	but no money.
		+
		+	The Museum of Curiosity is, as ever, hosted by the Professor of Ignorance from the University of Buckingham John Lloyd (now with added C.B.E). For this, the fourth series, he is joined by the intensely curious comedian Dave Gorman as his Curator. Dave is the latest in a line of illustrious Museum curators: Bill Bailey, Sean Lock and Jon Richardson.
		+
		+	The Museum of Curiosity has a unique method for collecting exhibits. Once a week it welcomes three luminaries from widely different specialist fields and asks them to bring with them their most treasured items to donate.
		+
		+	The Museum's collection already boasts The Big Bang When It Was The Size Of A Grapefruit; A Pineapple; A Yard Of Silence; Nothing; A British Railways Bridge Plate; A Telepathic Sheep; A Chimpanzee Rain Dance; An Impossible Rabbit; A Gay Bomb; A Choir Of Singing Sand Dunes; National Ignorance Day (of which we know nothing); and An Icelandic Volcano (long before they were fashionable).
		+
		+	Scrapeing letters offf
		+	Recursiveness.
		+	Magical thinking where printing is concerned.
		+	Scale
		+	Printer fengshui?
		+	Meditating drones
		+	WHY DID I NOT GET AN SL PRINTER? WHY? WHY? SL 3D printing has a lot less drama to it than FFF 3D printing: there is no filament spools to get entangled, no nozzle clogging, no overheating hot-ends, no disastrous warps or other similar entertaining events. - See more at: http://3dprintingforbeginners.com/formlabs-form1-review/#sthash.sPUqM5dF.dpuf