Difference between revisions of "Methods & Sources of Historical Research"
From Wikicliki
(→Public Records) |
|||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
* 5 year weeding through materials - if they are useful keep, if not useful destroy - a system of reviews / 25 year second weed of material --> designated places of public deposit (local record offices) - see: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/our-archives-sector-role/legislation/approved-places-of-deposit/ (eg: records of surrey might be kept in surrey) | * 5 year weeding through materials - if they are useful keep, if not useful destroy - a system of reviews / 25 year second weed of material --> designated places of public deposit (local record offices) - see: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/our-archives-sector-role/legislation/approved-places-of-deposit/ (eg: records of surrey might be kept in surrey) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * WHY ARE MOST BOAT RECORDS AT Greenwich , National Maritime Museum? - cos boat stuff seems more suitable there | ||
+ | * WHY IS INDIA OFFICE RECORDS IN BL: Kew rationale that anything outside of English, Latin, French - they have no specialisation, so they gave it to British Library. | ||
== Notes == | == Notes == | ||
* DEBBIE'S NOTES: copies of letters, drafted until perfect.... | * DEBBIE'S NOTES: copies of letters, drafted until perfect.... |
Revision as of 13:25, 11 July 2016
Notes from a course on methods and sources of historical research at IHR, 11 July 2016 - 15 July 2016
The Nature of Archives and Primary Source Material
- Notion of difference between primary and secondary sources... but its quite fuzzy
- Primary = unmediated access to past (not processed by another mind)
- Newspapers = a report of what has been told. testimonies are primary but the reporter has chewed thru the material.
- Historians make statements about things which should be believed - by people who don't have access to primary sources
- Having looked at the primary sources = is the reason why people listen to historians
- Does digitization undermine the authority of the historian who derives his/her authority on basis on having the ability to find the primary source material? - should not be - because the historian should define his/her role based on his/her ability to contextualise
- Primary sources tend to be gathered and held in institutions called archives. historians tend to be interested in written material. others look at other types of materials , objects, material culture, etc.
- archive - gatekeepers? destroyed by organisations because deemed not of interest?
- uk? governments destroy 90%? of records - horrifying but also liberating
- previously history was dead white male europeans, now there is a broadening of history
- an archive is a set of staff to administer a procedure of cataloguing and ordering
- the diff between archival and library catalogue is that libraries have certain systems which attempt to divide human knowledge into recognisable chunks
- archive - institutional procedure orders it rather the dewey
- archive - not published material
- library - published
- brick and mortar reality to an archive (not pure virtual)
- talking about it in relation to organisation / but also there is question of power of access / gatekeeper
- point is that we will need to apply a different method of accessing / searching when using archives (compared to libraries) as they are accessed differently
- surrogacy: what is an original? today we like copies, we think of them as being useful.
- digitisation processes
- money, power, etc
- archives -> state / nation building --> even church was doing this
- newspapers - pdf ocr - things missed out: compositor (context of what was around this article, what else would be seen by a real reader of newspaper with many articles), marginalia, emphasis, etc
- Qn to ponder: what is a public record?
Public Records
- public interest, clearly important, to governments, related to the public affairs
- https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-freedom-of-information/what-is-the-foi-act/
- http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/legislation/public-records-act/
- Public Records - "extremely accurate and almost valueless" (as a definition) - it is basically defined by the Public Records Acts
- http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
- 5 year weeding through materials - if they are useful keep, if not useful destroy - a system of reviews / 25 year second weed of material --> designated places of public deposit (local record offices) - see: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/archives-sector/our-archives-sector-role/legislation/approved-places-of-deposit/ (eg: records of surrey might be kept in surrey)
- WHY ARE MOST BOAT RECORDS AT Greenwich , National Maritime Museum? - cos boat stuff seems more suitable there
- WHY IS INDIA OFFICE RECORDS IN BL: Kew rationale that anything outside of English, Latin, French - they have no specialisation, so they gave it to British Library.
Notes
- DEBBIE'S NOTES: copies of letters, drafted until perfect....