Difference between revisions of "The Substation Town Hall"
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|- style="vertical-align:top;" | |- style="vertical-align:top;" | ||
|'''The Board's role needs to be clarified to the public''' | |'''The Board's role needs to be clarified to the public''' | ||
− | * Is it due for an overhaul? The current board has been in place for a long time. It left The Substation without an Artistic Director for 9 months. Rarely has one seen an arts organisation left without direction for so long, to the point where artists become very concerned about its fate. Does the board really still care about The Substation? | + | * Is it due for an overhaul? The current board has been in place for a long time. It left The Substation without an Artistic Director for 9 months in 2015. Rarely has one seen an arts organisation left without direction for so long, to the point where everyone including the artists become very concerned about its fate or whether it would close down. Does the board really still care about The Substation? How can it prove it? |
* Can there be more public transparency in how the board operates? It is currently like a black box - many artists who have worked with The Substation sometimes don't even know who it is on its board. Even some of us who thought we knew, actually didn't realise that members of the board had stepped down or had reduced their involvement with it. | * Can there be more public transparency in how the board operates? It is currently like a black box - many artists who have worked with The Substation sometimes don't even know who it is on its board. Even some of us who thought we knew, actually didn't realise that members of the board had stepped down or had reduced their involvement with it. | ||
* Accountability and connection with the artists of today - are the board in touch with the needs of artists today? Do they see what is happening on the ground in the arts today, in order to allow them to make the best executive decisions and advice for The Substation? | * Accountability and connection with the artists of today - are the board in touch with the needs of artists today? Do they see what is happening on the ground in the arts today, in order to allow them to make the best executive decisions and advice for The Substation? | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
'''Labour and Fair remuneration for artists and artworkers:''' | '''Labour and Fair remuneration for artists and artworkers:''' | ||
* With a so-called lean team at hand, where do they draw the distinction between artists as practitioners and artists as part time staff? | * With a so-called lean team at hand, where do they draw the distinction between artists as practitioners and artists as part time staff? | ||
− | * Fair pay for staff: The staff of The Substation are key to its running, it is their passion for their jobs and professionalism which makes it what it is, yet they will end up working extremely long hours with very little remuneration. This potentially makes it very hard for the team to do its best when met with personal pressures as well as work pressures. The staff (starting from the | + | * Fair pay for staff: The staff of The Substation are key to its running, it is their passion for their jobs and professionalism which makes it what it is, yet they will end up working extremely long hours with very little remuneration. This potentially makes it very hard for the team to do its best when met with personal pressures as well as work pressures. The staff (starting from the Artistic Director, General manager, programmers, techs, operations, finance, everyone else) need to be receiving a pay at market rate. |
+ | ** Question: What is the kind of of time and energy investment is the current AD going to be able to put in? (Does he currently juggle other hats? What are they? Is he planning on putting some other commitments aside to focus on The Substation? Will he make a statement on this, as there isn't much public information on this currently?) | ||
* At the interest of creating programmes with artists, how are artists compensated fairly? And how do we address issues of rights of the programme? | * At the interest of creating programmes with artists, how are artists compensated fairly? And how do we address issues of rights of the programme? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
'''Open season and sub season''' (Current AD has proposed a clear division within the year with an Open and Sub season as distinctly seperate) | '''Open season and sub season''' (Current AD has proposed a clear division within the year with an Open and Sub season as distinctly seperate) | ||
+ | * What are its parameters? | ||
* Will there be continuation of Partial Support or Venue Support?: In the past, many artists who did not get full support for their projects were sometimes helped by partial substation venue support, which helped make a lot of projects possible. Under the open season, will there still be partially supported events like in the past? | * Will there be continuation of Partial Support or Venue Support?: In the past, many artists who did not get full support for their projects were sometimes helped by partial substation venue support, which helped make a lot of projects possible. Under the open season, will there still be partially supported events like in the past? | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
'''The Public Voice''' | '''The Public Voice''' | ||
− | * Why release a document under the name of Substation which represents the current AD's unmediated voice of management? [http://www.scribd.com/doc/300578396/BACKGROUND-EARLIER-PROPOSAL-MAY-12-2015-By-Alan-Oei BACKGROUND / EARLIER PROPOSAL MAY 12 2015 - By Alan Oei] | + | * Why release a document under the name of Substation which represents the current AD's unmediated voice of management? [http://www.scribd.com/doc/300578396/BACKGROUND-EARLIER-PROPOSAL-MAY-12-2015-By-Alan-Oei BACKGROUND / EARLIER PROPOSAL MAY 12 2015 - By Alan Oei] This is not a text that all artists know how to read. It is not in the language for the masses, but looks like a document for upper management. Why release it wholesale? |
'''Inclusivity of communities''' | '''Inclusivity of communities''' |
Revision as of 14:16, 29 February 2016
IMPORTANT NOTE: the content in this page is not mine only but has been edited/compiled from various recent discussions with a number of other artists/art workers and also from other shared google docs. Some of the ideas have been reworded in my words. It was difficult to grasp the enormity of it all the issues so i thought it would be beneficial to divide it into questions on different levels. I have reorganised and typed it out in the hopes of just providing some useful starting points for thinking about The Substation.
Executive
Big picture / Meta-substation |
Operations
The day to day running of an art space |
Curatorial
Artistic decisions |
The Board's role needs to be clarified to the public
Ownership
|
Labour and Fair remuneration for artists and artworkers:
Open season and sub season (Current AD has proposed a clear division within the year with an Open and Sub season as distinctly seperate)
|
Process
The Public Voice
Inclusivity of communities
Cabinet of Curiosities (Current AD has proposed a "cabinet of curiosities". details are still forthcoming)
Difficult questions: The Substation's direction now seems to be one that encourages artists to deal with "difficult questions" and think critically about society at large, and to reassess perhaps the stakes artists have in society. Difficult questions, surely, will include issues the state will not be willing to confront including operation coldstore, operation spectrum, josef ng, lack of democracy, 377a, labour rights, human rights, queer communities, capital punishment just to name a few. Will substation be ready to support artists who wish to deal with these concerns? |