Difference between revisions of "Healthcare Futures Workshop"
From Wikicliki
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* if robots are defined by tasks they can accomplish, in which ways do their performance excel over humans? | * if robots are defined by tasks they can accomplish, in which ways do their performance excel over humans? | ||
| − | [[File: | + | [[File:hfw_1.jpg|800px]] |
| + | |||
| + | [[File:hfw_2.jpg|800px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:hfw_3.jpg|800px]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:hfw_4.jpg|800px]] | ||
== thoughts == | == thoughts == | ||
Revision as of 05:52, 12 December 2014
- defining a robot is difficult.
- there is no singular care receiver - many different stereotypical uses (problematic), many different value systems.
- if robots are defined by tasks they can accomplish, in which ways do their performance excel over humans?
thoughts
- NPC-equivalent in our real world
- Free-roaming bots which cause small amounts of chaos - in far away/rural areas
- robots which endear by being mostly right but sometimes mischievously wrong.
- Unplugging cables so a human must come in to fix things
- robots which go around earning love credits where they can
- how to measure connections made? not about quantity though
- more about the quality of one or two relationships
- if something runs only for the duration that the user is alive. if its energy source is tied together to the user.
